<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>信息判断 on 安知生 angelife</title><link>https://angelife.github.io/series/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E5%88%A4%E6%96%AD/</link><description>Recent content in 信息判断 on 安知生 angelife</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.162.1</generator><language>zh-cn</language><copyright>2009–2026 angelife / 安知生</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 01:50:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://angelife.github.io/series/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E5%88%A4%E6%96%AD/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>信息源瘦身：为什么关注少一点，判断力更强</title><link>https://angelife.github.io/columns/information-judgment/information-source-slimming/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 01:50:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://angelife.github.io/columns/information-judgment/information-source-slimming/</guid><description>信息源不是越多越好。真正有价值的信息环境，应当减少噪音、提高密度，让注意力服务于长期判断。</description></item><item><title>信息质量判断框架：先看来源，再看叙事</title><link>https://angelife.github.io/columns/information-judgment/information-quality-framework/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://angelife.github.io/columns/information-judgment/information-quality-framework/</guid><description>判断信息质量不能只看观点是否顺耳，而要看来源、证据、叙事方式、利益位置和纠错机制。真正好的信息源，经得起追问。</description></item></channel></rss>